Supplements

BPC-157, NAD+, GHK-CU Patch

• 25/100 science score
• $100 price
• Promoted by Gary Brecka

Overview

This product scores low due to predominant reliance on animal/preclinical data without robust human RCTs validating claims for healing, energy, or anti-aging via transdermal delivery. Examine.com notes BPC-157's rat tendon healing at 10μg/kg IP (human equiv ~1.6μg/kg oral), but no human PK or efficacy trials exist, and patch doses (2mg) far exceed without absorption proof. NAD+ 250mg patches claim cellular energy, yet no studies confirm transdermal bioavailability matching oral precursors (300-1

Key strengths

• Convenient non-invasive patch delivery
• Promising animal data for BPC-157 regeneration
• Anecdotal reports of recovery/energy benefits

Our analysis

Avoid this product due to insufficient human evidence, regulatory warnings, and lack of quality controls. Consider proven alternatives like oral NAD precursors or topical GHK creams for specific benefits. Consult a physician before use.

Frequently asked questions

Is BPC-157, NAD+, GHK-CU Patch worth buying?

BPC-157, NAD+, GHK-CU Patch has a Verify Influencers trust score of 25/100 based on ingredient quality, clinical evidence, and third-party testing.

What is the trust score for BPC-157, NAD+, GHK-CU Patch?

BPC-157, NAD+, GHK-CU Patch scored 25 out of 100 in our science-backed analysis, which evaluates ingredient dosages against clinical literature and manufacturing transparency.

Browse all scored products · How products are scored